Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Composite

Entertainment

Hawley Introduces Bill to Limit Disney’s Copyright Protection as Musk Says Current Regulation ‘Overzealous’

“The age of Republican handouts to Big Business is over.”

Spread the love

Senator Josh Hawley has introduced a bill to strip Disney and other “woke” corporations of their special copyright protection, as Elon Musk slammed the current copyright regulations as being absurd and “overzealous.”

On Tuesday, Hawley introduced the Copyright Clause Restoration Act, which would limit new copyright claims to 56 years, the original limit that existed from the early 20th Century up to January 1978.

Disney famously lobbied the United States to increase the length of copyright claims in a bid to secure indefinite ownership over its iconic characters, including Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck.

However, not only would this apply to new applications, but would also retroactively apply to the copyright protections of large corporations such as Disney, who have received special copyright protections of up to 120 years, “well beyond the original maximum of 28 years.”

In a statement on his website, Hawley said that “the age of Republican handouts to Big Business is over. Thanks to special copyright protections from Congress, woke corporations like Disney have earned billions while increasingly pandering to woke activists. It’s time to take away Disney’s special privileges and open up a new era of creativity and innovation.”

Responding to an article covering Hawley’s legislation, tech billionaire and future Twitter owner Elon Musk slammed the current regulations overall. While not commenting on the new bill, Musk said that the current legislation “goes absurdly far beyond protecting the original creator.”

Related  Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro Secures 'Complete And Total Endorsement' From Donald Trump

Musk added that “overzealous” implementation of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a “plague on humanity.”

The copyright legislation from Hawley follows Disney’s insertion of itself squarely into the political sphere. The corporation released a statement at the end of March condemning Florida for its new parental rights law, demanding that the bill be repealed by the legislature or defeated in the courts.

As a result, Disney was stripped of its private government body, the Reedy Creek Improvement District, which houses Disney World in Orlando. The move will likely lead to heavier tax burdens for them in future.

Spread the love
Jack Hadfield
Written By

Jack Hadfield is the Associate Editor at Valiant News. An investigative reporter from the UK, and the director and presenter of "Destination Dover: Migrants in the Channel, his work has appeared in such sites as Breitbart and The Political Insider. You can follow him on Gab @JH, on Telegram @JackHadders, or see his other social media by visiting jackhadfield.co.uk.

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Avatar

    Recognizing Truth

    May 13, 2022 at 7:28 am

    My solution:

    For individuals:
    Initial copyrights for original works should be granted for 30 years to the author/creator. If still living at the time of expiration, he or she may renew them once for an additional 15 years or their death, whichever comes first. Heirs and estates cannot hold copyrights past the death of the author/creator.

    For companies:
    The company can hold an initial copyright for 15 years and have exclusive rights to it. They may renew it for an additional 15 years during which they MUST offer licensed use of the copyrighted material at “customary and reasonable rates” to businesses or individuals who wish to use it in a derivative work.

    • Avatar

      bowigi

      May 16, 2022 at 2:44 am

      I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I it…GOOD LUCK.. 𝐰𝐰𝐰.𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐛𝐳.𝐜𝐨𝐦

  2. Avatar

    Recce1

    May 13, 2022 at 11:43 pm

    I wonder if Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 of the Constitution:”No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed” would apply to companies with prior protections. I hope not.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Trending on Valiant News:

Liberal Hypocrisy

"He's not too sure," Biden said of the little boy, who then quickly scurried away from the president. 

Politics

McConnell vowed never to speak to Donald Trump again on the night of January 6, but later feared political reprisal should he impeach

World News

International media is none too pleased with Giorgia Meloni's victory, and have called the Italian populist everything from Literally Mussolini to a Threat to...

Social Media

Nick Clegg, president for global affairs at Meta, said that they will consult with "experts" to assess the chance of harm being caused by...