Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Exterior of the 5th Circuit Court building in Louisiana
Exterior of the 5th Circuit Court building in Louisiana
Minor Wisdom Courthouse in Lafayette Square, New Orleans, Louisiana (Infrogmation / Edited)

Politics

Liberals Panic After 5th Circuit Upholds Texas Law Banning Big Tech Censorship

The court upheld a Texas law that bars companies from censoring users based on viewpoints, infuriating leftists online

Spread the love

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit has upheld a Texas social media law that bars companies from removing posts or banning users based on a user’s viewpoints – especially based on political ideology – which overturns a lower court’s decision to block the law.

The opinion was written by Judge Andrew Stephen Oldham, a judge nominated to the 5th Circuit Court by President Donald Trump. Judge Oldham was joined by Judge Edith Jones, a President Ronald Reagan appointee. Judge Leslie H. Southwick, a President George W. Bush appointee, concurred in part and dissented in part.

In Judge Oldham’s opening statement, he wrote:

In urging such sweeping relief, the platforms offer a rather odd inversion of the First Amendment. That Amendment, of course, protects every person’s right to ‘the freedom of speech.’ But the platforms argue that buried somewhere in the person’s enumerated right to free speech lies a corporation’s unenumerated right to muzzle speech.

Today we reject the idea that corporations have a freewheeling First Amendment right to censor what people say. Because the district court held otherwise, we reverse its injunction and remand for further proceedings.

The court ultimately concluded:

Excerpt from the 5th Circuit Court's decision

Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee, a Christian and conservative satire website that was censored by Twitter for mocking transgender Admiral Rachel Levine.

Related  PELOSI: Biden's Only 'Great Service' To The US Was Beating Trump, I Won't Pledge To Back Him In 2024

“March 2022: Twitter locks out the Babylon Bee,” wrote Dillon, adding that in September the 5th Circuit determined “the law is constitutional because it chills censorship, not speech.”

The decision made by the 5th Circuit Court “broke” many left-leaning users of social media.

Shoshana Weissmann, Digital Director & Fellow at R Street Institute tweeted that she was had “a box of tissues and ice cream” to dive into the 5th Circuit ruling. Claims that the Court rewrote the First Amendment started circling the web.

Alejandra Caraballo tweeted “If you want examples of unchecked social media driven by algorithmic amplification, look at Myanmar and the Rohingya or northern India and Muslims.”

Conservatives, meanwhile, celebrated the decision, with many hoping it will signal an end to the big tech censorship that began with controversial right wing figures like Milo Yiannopoulos, Gavin McInnes, and Alex Jones, and eventually saw 45th President Donald Trump banned from social media while in the White House.

Spread the love
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Trending on Valiant News:

Government Overreach

The program will also be used to scramble linguistic patterns, making it impossible to crack the identity of authors that they wanted to keep...

Politics

"It's humbling" ... "It's the most humbling thing I've ever seen" ... "It's absolutely humbling." ... "You gotta have somebody show you"

Politics

Cheney plans to strip the power of the VP to reject electoral results, even though Cheney et al assert that power doesn't exist...

Government Overreach

"Now it's illegal under federal law to punish whistleblowers, but the FBI did it anyway," Carlson noted.