Nancy Pelosi refused to engage fully with a question about whether or not her husband has ever made stock purchases based on information she gained from her position as an elected official.
“Has your husband ever made a stock purchase or sale based on information he’s received from you?”
Pelosi appeared irritated by the question, leaning into the microphone and snapping, “What are you saying?”
“Has your husband ever made a stock purchase or sale based on information he’s received from you?”
Pelosi smirked. “No, absolutely not. Okay, thank you,” she said, hurrying away from the podium.
"Has your husband ever made a stock purchase or sale based on information he's received from you?"
NANCY PELOSI, smirking: "No, absolutely not" pic.twitter.com/cjtYkZZ6Gm
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 21, 2022
Paul Pelosi, the 82-year-old husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol and causing injury by the Napa County District Attorney’s office in June.
“Today, the Napa County District Attorney’s Office issued a criminal complaint, filing charges against Paul Pelosi based upon an automobile collision and driving under the influence arrest on May 28th,2022,” the law enforcement agency said in a statement. “The collision occurred on State Route 29 and Oakville Cross Road at 10:17 pm.”
The press release stated that “A blood sample was taken from Mr. Pelosi at 12:32 am, and sent to the California Department of Justice for testing. Mr. Pelosi’s blood sample had a .082% blood alcohol content.”
“The charges filed today include Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol Causing Injury and Driving With .08% Blood Alcohol Level or Higher Causing Injury,” the statement continued. “Under California law, these charges can be filed as a misdemeanor or felony. Based upon the extent of the injuries suffered by the victim, the District Attorney filed misdemeanor charges. This decision is consistent with how our office handles these cases with similar injuries.”
The DA’s office noted that the potential sentence could include “up to five years of probation, a minimum of five days in jail, installation of an ignition
interlock device, fines and fees, completion of a court ordered drinking driver class, and other terms as appropriate.”

Steve
July 21, 2022 at 3:45 pm
They’re above the law, you peasants. Police in the USA make sure of it.
You blind cop suckers make sure those police keep doing it.
See how it works? 😉
Walt
July 21, 2022 at 5:12 pm
He is also a murderer!
Mr Mustashe
July 21, 2022 at 7:22 pm
SHUT THE F UP!… YOU *SSHOLE!
Recce1
July 21, 2022 at 8:17 pm
Are you afraid to spell out your foul language puerile caitiff?
Mr Mustashe
July 21, 2022 at 9:08 pm
SHUT THE F UP!… YOU *SSHOLE!
Recce1
July 21, 2022 at 8:15 pm
Post your proof if you have any. Paul was driving at 16 when he lost control of a sports car, likely due to speeding and inexperience. His older brother was killed. The coroner’s jury didn’t charge Paul with homicide.
Do you know better? Were you there? Or is it more likely that in your hatred of the Speaker you’re willing to believe and spread any lie about her and her family?
A conservative constitutionalist Republican DEPLORABLE
Auntie Vaxina
July 21, 2022 at 8:06 pm
She ran like a rat off a sinking ship.
Recce1
July 21, 2022 at 8:20 pm
Ran off or fled like the title claims? Hardly! She simply walked away calmly at the end of her interview. not that hyper partisans would understand that.
A conservative Deplorable
Mr Mustashe
July 21, 2022 at 9:05 pm
Violating Securities Laws is one thing… especially, if there is a CONFLICT OF INTEREST!… but, giving your spouse a stock suggestion during breakfast, IS NOT! And, WASTING THE TIME OF FELLOW PRESS MEMBERS ON A PARTISAN QUESTION THAT HAS NO BASIS IN REALITY, SHOULD BE MET WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE “PARTISAN *SSHOLE”! AND SO, IF THE REPORTER IN QUESTION FAILS TO PROVIDE A “RATIONAL AND FACTUAL” FOLLOW-UP QUESTION IN A FUTURE SCRUM, THEN THE REPORTER SHOULD BE KEPT FROM ENTERING A NEWS SCRUM– LET ALONE, PARTICIPATING IN ONE!
And once again, Nancy Pelosi is not her husband!… and .08% alcohol is a far cry from what many have been let go with!… nevertheless, drinking and driving is being willfully stupid! BUT, it is MR. PELOSI’S job to get HIS sh*t together!… and just like it’s Trump’s job to keep from SEXUALLY ABUSING CHILDREN, PLAYING WITH MARRIED WOMEN’S “KITTENS”, INVESTING IN RUSSIAN ENTERPRISES, FAILING TO COMPLY WITH A DEPOSITION ORDER CONCERNING HIS PAST “BUSINESS DEALINGS”, INSTIGATING RIOTS AT THE WHITE HOUSE AND OTHER FEDERAL BUILDINGS, ASSAULTING AND THREATENING U.S. SECURITY AGENTS, CAUSING THE DEATHS OF MILLIONS OF AMERICANS BY PLAYING-DOWN THE URGENCY OF COVID19 TO AMERICANS, PROFFERING FAKE NEWS (IN THE GUISE OF “LEGIT NEWS”… AND E.G., HIS CR*P THAT THE 2020 ELECTIONS WERE RIGGED– DESPITE EVIDENCE FROM CONSERVATIVE COURTS WHICH REVEALED THEY WEREN’T!; HIS PROMOTION OF “PIZZAGATE”– WITH THE AID OF PUTIN AND COMPANY; AND, HIS DEFENSE OF RACISTS!) AND GENERALLY, AND REGULARLY ACTING LIKE A SOCIOPSYCHOPATH!
No wonder why over 60,000 Mental Health Professionals signed a Petition in 2017 to have this character MENTALLY ASSESSED!… and why his niece, CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST, Mary Trump, declared him to be, “THE MOST DANGEROUS MAN ON EARTH”, when he was in Office!
Hey, you’d be nervous and paranoid also, if you were faced with the prospect of having to spend decades behind bars, and wearing an orange jumpsuit… nevertheless, I have it from credible authorities that orange is his favourite colour!… and, yellow, is his favourite character trait!
bit(.)ly/3RMdJK1
bit(.)ly/3RMxWiJ
bit(.)ly/3RQSsPa
Milo
July 21, 2022 at 9:56 pm
Dude only blew 0.82. Not really wasted, the law used to be 1.0.
However, if I were married to that hag, I would be perpetually in the 2.0 range.
Mr Mustashe
July 21, 2022 at 10:21 pm
SHUT THE F UP!… YOU *SSHOLE!
JrNeymar
July 22, 2022 at 3:31 pm
Eat shxt you low IQ, lazy sofa surfer
KillACommieForYourMommy
July 22, 2022 at 1:20 am
The Pelosi shuffle! It’s more like a stagger…
Maynard Hirsch
July 22, 2022 at 9:09 am
California is a community property state. That means Nancy gets 1/2 of her husbands property and money. She should be charged with ethics violations and lose her position in the House. Anyone think she will?