Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Education & CRT

Berkeley Prof Accuses Josh Hawley Of Being ‘Transphobic’ For Asking If Women Get Pregnant

A liberal professor from California accused Sen. Josh Hawley of being “transphobic” for asking if women get pregnant.

Spread the love

Berkeley professor and professional social justice warrior Khiara Bridges accused Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of being “transphobic” because he asked her if women had the “capacity for pregnancy” during a Senate hearing on Tuesday.

“Professor Bridges, you said several times, you’ve used a phrase, I want to understand what you mean by it. You’ve referred to ‘people with a capacity for pregnancy,’ would that be women?” Hawley asked.

Bridges pointed out that straight heterosexual females are capable of being pregnant, but noted that some are unable. She used the term “cis women” — a liberal translation meaning heterosexual biological female, to describe them.

“Many women, cis women, have the capacity for pregnancy. Many cis women do not have the capacity for pregnancy,” she replied.

She added that biological women who truly believe they are men, liberally described as “trans men,” also possess the ability to get pregnant, including women who do not personally identify with any specific gender, despite being biological women, liberally described as “nonbinary people.”

“There are also trans men who are capable of pregnancy as well as nonbinary people who are capable of pregnancy,” she added.

“So this isn’t really a women’s rights issue?” Hawley asked Bridges.

“We can recognize that this impacts women while recognizing that it impacts other groups,” she replied. “Those things are not mutually exclusive Hawley.”

“Your view is that the core of this ‘right,’ then is about what?” Hawley said.

Related  Liberals Panic After 5th Circuit Upholds Texas Law Banning Big Tech Censorship

Bridges then accused Hawley of being “transphobic” because he asked if women can become pregnant and that pointing out such an idea “opens up trans people to violence.”

“Wow,” Hawley said. “So you’re saying that I’m opening up people to violence by asking whether or not women are the folks who can have pregnancies?”

Bridges then claimed that trans people commit suicide because people don’t believe they exist. “Do you believe that men can get pregnant?” she asked the Senator.

“No, I don’t think men can get pregnant,” Hawley replied.

“So you’re denying that trans people exist,” Bridges said. The Senator replied, “and that leads to violence?”

“Is this how you run your classroom,” asked Hawley. “Are students allowed to question you or are they also treated like this?”

Spread the love
Avatar
Written By

Andrew White is a Northern Virginia native. His work has been previously featured on Alex Jones’ Infowars, Revolver News, and The Liberty Daily. White is a constitutionalist Patriot, who focuses on social issues, election integrity, globalism, US politics, as well as general corporate and government corruption.

8 Comments

8 Comments

  1. Avatar

    Blue Skies

    July 12, 2022 at 11:08 pm

    Talk about this country going to hell in a hand basket??!!
    Where is common sense???
    What on earth is being taught in our schools???
    PS-Men, DO NOT HAVE A UTERUS!

  2. Avatar

    Recce1

    July 12, 2022 at 11:54 pm

    Prof. Bridges and SCOTUS Justice Jackson are excellent examples of why Dr. Michael Savage and Dr. Lyle Lassiter say that liberalism (modern) is a mental illness.

    In addition, Prof. Bridges’ erratic eye movements show an inability to focus on reality and a need to conjure up nonsensical answers to straight forward questions about basic facts of life.

    Furthermore, her need to accuse Sen. Hawley of promoting violence against people who, due to their inability to understand basic scientific facts, are mentally ill shows the absurdity of her position and its danger to the college students in her tender loving care.

    What we need is an adherence to 2 Chronicles 7:14. May God have mercy on what’s left of the Great American Experiment.

    • Avatar

      Racecar

      July 13, 2022 at 12:07 am

      I agree with you completely !!!!

  3. Avatar

    Ernst

    July 13, 2022 at 12:28 am

    Berkeley professor and professional social justice warrior Khiara Bridges has a reality problem. Berkley must have a difficult time finding professors to stoop this low. What garbage! The Democrat Party is now the Party of trans freaks while the Republican Party is the Party of normal humans. Sorry (not sorry) if I offend anyone.

  4. Avatar

    Dennis Stewart

    July 13, 2022 at 12:41 am

    Ask this professor of DECEIT…how many morons are in a peck? And how many nit wits are in a bushel?

  5. Avatar

    Gregory

    July 13, 2022 at 12:45 am

    I for one refuse to accept these WOKE Leftists ideology or terminology. They can make all the accusations they wish against me. I do not subscribe to their World views and no amount of bullying will change my mind. We all know the Left get violent when they receive pushback or don’t get their way. I say keep pushing they cannot help but expose themselves for who they truly are.

  6. Avatar

    JOHN MAYOR

    July 13, 2022 at 1:13 pm

    W̲H̲A̲T̲ ̲I̲S̲ ̲A̲ ̲G̲E̲N̲D̲E̲R̲: S̲E̲X̲U̲A̲L̲ ̲G̲A̲S̲L̲I̲G̲H̲T̲E̲R̲S̲ ̲A̲N̲D̲ ̲S̲E̲X̲U̲A̲L̲ ̲G̲A̲S̲L̲I̲G̲H̲T̲I̲N̲G̲
    .
    .
    One who attempts to defend a “psychosexual orientation” that one is uncomfortable with by attempting to transfer one’s unease to the psyches of those who one believes “have the goods” on one’s self-deception (and psyches, that one perceives may trigger– even inadvertently!– feelings of guilt, self-loathing, paranoia and etc.), is a SEXUAL GASLIGHTER… and the practice, is SEXUAL GASLIGHTING! – JOHN MAYOR
    .
    (See, What is gaslighting, Audiopedia (place URL in the search bar for genmirror*com/ytp, and hit Enter)
    .
    .
    Attention!… there is a pronoun/ determiner solution below (see, paragraph beginning, “ΤΌἝΝ/ ΤΌ+ἝΝ…”… and to be frank, this is where the “gender meets the road”!
    .
    .
    (Attention, the ensuing reply was prepared in the monospace Consolas Font [at 8-point BOLD], at a max screen width of 166 characters. To print, use “legal landscape”! Unfortunately, many websites do not have a “collapse widget” whereby lengthy replies can be efficiently and effectively “tucked away” to reduce “comment clutter”, nor a Blog Comment Host widget that/ which will afford MY CHOICE of font/ font size, and an ability to display a comment script utilizing the full screen width! A pitty!)
    .
    ____________________
    .
    .
    G̲e̲n̲d̲e̲r̲ ̲P̲r̲o̲n̲o̲u̲n̲s̲ ̲A̲n̲d̲ ̲D̲e̲t̲e̲r̲m̲i̲n̲e̲r̲s̲
    .
    .
    The Greeks have given us AMPLE root expressions with which to craft ADEQUATE neutral pronouns/ determiners with which to describe our anthropophýlougenesis (i.e., our human gender genesis)… but, unfortunately, much of our psycholinguageny (mental language production!) is a “LINGUAJACKING” of the expressivity possible through this millennia-old tool scripted by some of the best minds that the world has ever been witness to! And this “LANGUAGEJACKING”/ “GLÓSSAJACKING” has led to a “dumbing down” of our cultures… and even of our said “sciences”– and, of our “social sciences”, in particular!
    .
    BTW… should we “dummy down” our Mathematics expressivity because our equations have become a tad too complex?… and should JK Rowling become a bit more “street” in her expressivity in order to appeal to a larger audience? If not, then delimiting our expressivity by way of the “BASTARDIZATION (ILLEGITIMIZATION!)” of the languages afforded to us by more dedicated souls, is a slight to their memory and an afront to TRUE literacy!
    .
    “SEMIOTIC GASLIGHTING”/ “SEMIOTIC HYPERBOLISM”/ “SEMIOPATHOSIS (see, Semiotics)” is the e̲ffectation of “meaning control” through “semiotic bullies (and, e.g., through our ‘CORPORATE BRANDING COMMUNITY’/ ad community/ marketing community, and etc)” that/ which seeks to control the “meaning agenda” for things and/ or for processes… proffering, that their “meaning”/ symbolism is a “sign” of perfection, and that those which are without the “beastly mark” are “out of the loop” and not a part of the “in crowd”/ the “whatever brand crowd”! Such would have us believe that “BRANDING” is synonymo̲s̲ with “CULTURE”!… that wearing an advertisement (for which, one isn’t paid!… indeed, FOR WHICH, THE WEARER PAYS– AND DEARLY!) is what “WE” want! And in this gender battle, the Semiotic Gaslighting/ Semiotic Hyperbolism/ Semiopathosis is in the form of, “PSEUDO-GENDER BRANDING”!… but, etc.!
    .
    CURSE KERDOSEMIOPATHOSIS (the state, condition and process of gainful/ for-profit meaning making pathy!)!… AND, PHÝLOUSEMIOPATHOSIS (gender semiopathosis!)!
    .
    The following article is a recent example of a form of Semiotic Gaslighting wherein we are “encouraged” to cast all those who use formal syntax as evil, and worthy of condemnation…
    .
    phys*org/news/2022-03-aks-linguistic-prejudice-perpetuates-inequality.html
    .
    To the matter…
    .
    I, would have such children assessed for Dyslexia, I’d report this teacher for an instance of RACISM and of a HATE CRIME, and I’d have him removed from his “teaching” post and lobby that his FORMER STUDENTS not attend any of his classes again!
    .
    “Linguicism”/ SEMIOTIC REVISIONISM/ GLÓSSAJACKING/ LÍNGUAJACKING/ LANGUAGEJACKING– in this case!– is an excuse for RACISM, HATE CRIMES and the “BASTARDIZATION” of a language (English or otherwise!)!… and if there be a LEGITIMATE CASE for the reinsertion of “AXE (and not ‘aks’!)” into mainstream English language usage, then this should be ratified by way of academic avenues (and, because, “AXE [not ‘aks’!]” has received such an overwhelming degree of professional and lay interest and support, that the SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNITY is SCIENTIFICALLY COMPELLED to reexamine the historic precedence for the use of “AXE [not ‘aks’!]” as a standard English expression in contemporary English language usage). Otherwise, we are inviting RACISM, HATE and ANARCHY in the G̲U̲I̲S̲E̲ of a “SCIENTIFIC JUSTIFICATION” of/ for a verbal and UNETHI̲C̲ ASSAULT on past and present teachers of English! And this use of “dyslexic terms”… but, also, colloquialisms/ slang!… in favour of SCIENTIFICALLY VETTED LANGUAGE/ STRUCTURED LANGUAGE, is but one example of FAILED SPEECH and of “PSEUDOLINGUISTIC GASLIGHTING”! And which can also be found within mainstream “science discourse”, and within the “SEXUAL GASLIGHTING” pap being promulgated by a majority of the elements of the “TORN THAT WAY” and “PORN THAT WAY” LGBQ+ community, who wish to convince a majority of sympathetic and empathetic unwitting hapless “straight souls” that their language must now change to suit a community that claims a “BORN THAT WAY” title, and a Transgendered identity (in contrast, however, to the sciences of the Medi̲c̲ community!)!
    .
    STANDARDS in teaching and learning are ESSENTIAL for a student’s scholastic progress (though, failing to properly address the cause of a student’s inability to meet a scholastic benchmark… as has been the case– and is the case!– with children needing assessment for dyslexia, protection against school bullies, protection against violent or sexual abuse in the home or by teachers, poor or non-existant ventilation in the classroom, eye assessment, hearing assessment, good nutrition and adequate sleep [but, etc.]!… is to compromise a student’s progress by “professional default”!)… and without which, WE SUBJECT STUDENTS TO A CAPRICIOUS FUTURE!
    .
    To D̲A̲R̲E̲ ̲O̲F̲F̲E̲R̲ that the LEGITIMATE ATTEMPTS to impart NECESSARY ACADEMIC STANDARDS to needful students was steeped– and is today steeped– in a tradition of prejudice and cultural bias, WITHOUT PROOFS!… and, by way of the NON-LICENSED VIEWS of one, Tove Skutnabb-Kangas!… is to promote the practice of Psychiatry WITHOUT A DEGREE IN MEDICINE (at least!) and to assail the HONEST EFFORTS of hundreds of thousands of academicians (past, and present!)!
    .
    The following is another Phys*org article, titled: Uncrewed Artemis I mission to Moon pushed back (the “dated” contents of which, we need not pursue)…
    .
    “Pushed back?”… I don’t think so! And it’s this perverse manipulation of our language by indifferent PSEUDOLINGUISTIC BULLIES that/ which has gotten us into so much trouble!…and I– for one!– will refuse to give this particular “literacy” my support!
    .
    If you grab my front shoulders and push me into a snow pile, then I have fallen BACK into that snow pile– NOT FORWARD!… but, the character writing this story– and like some who have expressed themselves in this same stupored manner!– would have us believe that “PUSHING BACK” a scheduled date, is synonymo̲s̲ with setting a FUTURE DATE/ a FORWARD DATE!… S̲I̲L̲L̲Y̲– and, if not, M̲O̲R̲O̲N̲I̲C̲!
    .
    And this is why there are so many social challenges against mainstream media… i.e., when so many painstream media elements would rather run with “SPURIOUS LANGUAGE” rather than logi̲c̲l̲y̲ think notions and expressions through– and like the very recent attempt to IMPOSE/ BULLY the expression “THEIR” as a singular term for someone in a story whose sexual identity isn’t known or is unclear… and despite the fact, that we’ve a perfectly usable Greek use, THEIS (T-HEIS… for “the one referred to”), and a similar neologism, THEONE (pronounced, THONE… for “the one referred to”), to use as a SINGLE DETERMINER in place of the PLURAL DETERMINER, THEIR!)!
    .
    ΤΌἝΝ/ ΤΌ+ἝΝ (lower case, τόἕν/ τό+ἕν)/ T(O)HEIS/ T-HEIS/ THEIS (pronounced, THICE) or THE+ONE/ THEONE ((pronounced, THONE), for “the one referred to” (from the Greek, ΤΌ [lower case, τό]/ tó, for “the” [see, bit*ly/2VdAVIq… and see also, Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance reference at the bottom of the justaformentioned URL]… and, ἝΝ [lower case, ἕν]/ heis, for “one” [see, bit*ly/379JVkb]… and so, combining the “t-” from tó to “-heis”, or simply joining the Latin “the” and “one”, for theone). And the term, THEIS– in particular– has the same number of characters as the plural pronoun/ determiner, THEIR… and, except for the letter “r”, is spelt the same.
    .
    And to “encourage” the use of the abovenoted, when the subject of “he”, “she”, “s/he”, “their”, “they”, “them” comes up, simply replace any of these terms with THEIS, THEONE or THONE… and request that the hearer and/ or reader pass on these new expressions! And, if necessary– and convenient!– provide this Comment Log/ C̲log from a handy USB stick, for your recipient’s edification and recommunication. And, eventually, when a “social ‘linguistic meme’ threshold” has been achieved, the weight of the burden of the use of “he”, “she”, “s/he”, “their”, “they”, “them” (etc.!) can then be lifted… and the need to continue communicating this “gender prescription”!
    .
    .
    T̲h̲e̲ ̲S̲e̲m̲a̲n̲t̲i̲c̲ ̲W̲e̲b̲,̲ ̲F̲u̲n̲c̲t̲i̲o̲n̲a̲l̲ ̲L̲i̲n̲g̲u̲i̲s̲t̲i̲c̲s̲ ̲a̲n̲d̲ ̲H̲u̲m̲a̲n̲ ̲L̲a̲n̲g̲u̲a̲g̲e̲
    .
    .
    This is what happens when the definitions for numerous terms within a language become RELATIVE, NON-DEFINITIVE, INCONSISTENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND NON-INTEROPERABLE in and of themselves, and in relation to any and all other words within a given language… when the morphemic elements of a word’s etymology are poorly “constructed” in relation to each and every other word within a given language. And, the BEST EXAMPLE that I can provide within all languages that/ which sets the GOLD STANDARD for how NON-RELATIVE, DEFINITIVE, CONSISTENT, NON-SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND INTEROPERABLE expressivity can be had within, and between languages, is that to be found within a language’s Mathemati̲c̲ expressions.
    .
    And simply put, if addition was to be equated with subtraction and multiplication was to be equated with division… but, yea– and worse!– if the entirety of Math’s expressions were to be equated with RELATIVE, NON-DEFINITIVE, INCONSISTENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND NON-INTEROPERABLE definitions!… then how could any Mathematics be performed? How could mankind have reached the moon?
    .
    And so and thus, in order to achieve a SEMANTIC WEB, we’d do well to ensure that our “Language Rules” reflect our Mathematics Rules found within the “MATHEMATIC WEB”! In other words, the NON-RELATIVE, DEFINITIVE, CONSISTENT, NON-SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND INTEROPERABLE definitions of the Language of Mathematics, can– and, should!– be applied to the formation of NON-RELATIVE, DEFINITIVE, CONSISTENT, NON-SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND INTEROPERABLE definitions for all languages on the Web, generally!
    .
    If we desire a SEMANTIC WEB, we’d do well to communicate with the world’s best and brightest minds in the field of the “LANGUAGE OF MATHEMATICS”, to uncover how THEIR Rules can– and should– be applied to the “Semantic Web” and to the creation of the necessary Rules for Linguistics and languages, in general. If any group of people on earth can apply itself to the nigh intractable problem of RELATIVE, NON-DEFINITIVE, INCONSISTENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND NON-INTEROPERABLE definitions plaguing the “Semantic Web” and human language, surely those “failsafeguarding” and upholding the Rules of the language of Mathematics can! Indeed, the absolute best Expert System for the Semantic Web, and Linguistics, would be one derived from these very Rules!
    .
    In the Book of Isaiah, Chapter 5, we read:…
    .
    20) Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light, and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! 21) Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes. And clever in their own sight.
    .
    And so and thus, to interpose/ juxtapose the abovesaid scriptural direction onto the “RELATIVE, NON-DEFINITIVE, INCONSISTENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND NON-INTEROPERABLE LANGUAGE RULES PROBLEM” inherent within the application of the Semantic Web, and within Human language and FUNCTIONAL Linguistics, I add the following:…
    .
    Woe to those who label RELATIVE, NON-DEFINITIVE, INCONSISTENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND NON-INTEROPERABLE language good; who label NON-RELATIVE, DEFINITIVE, CONSISTENT, NON-SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND INTEROPERABLE language evil; and, who substitute NON-RELATIVE, DEFINITIVE, CONSISTENT, NON-SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND INTEROPERABLE speech with RELATIVE, NON-DEFINITIVE, INCONSISTENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND NON-INTEROPERABLE speech! Woe to those who are “semanti̲c̲l̲y̲ wise” and clever in their own eyes, and omit the vision– and truth!– of God!
    .
    And in Matthew Chapter 5 we read:…
    .
    33 “Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not break your oath, but fulfill to the Lord the vows you have made.’ 34 But I tell you, do not swear an oath at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne; 35 or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. 36 And do not swear by your head, for you can not make one hair white or black. 37 All you need to say, is simply, YES, or NO!; anything beyond this, COMES FROM THE EVIL ONE!”
    .
    “A FOOLISH consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines.” — Ralph Waldo Emerson
    .
    In other words, a NON-RELATIVE, DEFINITIVE, CONSISTENT, NON-SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND INTEROPERABLE LOGI̲C̲ SEMANTIC WEB, HUMAN LANGUAGE AND “FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS”, is a YES or is a NO!… OTHERWISE, WE DO HARM TO AN OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE SEMANTIC WEB, OF LANGUAGE AND OF FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS… AND IN TURN, SADISTICALLY IMPOSE A PROBLEMATIC– YEA, IMPRACTI̲C̲!– PSEUDOSEMANTIC WEB, HANDICAPPED HUMAN LANGUAGE AND DYSFUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS ON AN UNWITTING AND HAPLESS HUMANITY!
    .
    The “Rules of language” are RELATIVE, NON-DEFINITIVE, INCONSISTENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND NON-INTEROPERABLE… and so and thus, the attempt to incorporate Artificial Intelligence/ AI within language apps will continue to be problematic– and impracti̲c̲!– until it’s̲ proponents can find a “SCIENTIFIC METHOD” of overcoming language’s human-based willful RELATIVE, NON-DEFINITIVE, INCONSISTENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND NON-INTEROPERABLE speech… and due to the ICT requirement, that as PROPER LANGUAGE ALGORITHMS demand that Math’s equations “add up (i.e., are NON-RELATIVE, DEFINITIVE, CONSISTENT, NON-SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND INTEROPERABLE… or as Spock would put it: ‘Logi̲c̲’!)”, then any attempt to apply AI to the “LANGUAGE BEHAVIOURAL SEQUELA” of what amounts to, ANTHROPANASTROPHÉOPATHY (Human Behavioural Pathy… for ANASTROPHÉ, see bit*ly/3hfbDz6), is an exercise in “intellectual masochism” and “sociosadism (the latter, in any attempt to convince an unwitting and hapless webizen community of the ‘logic’ of the ILLOGIC of AI’s language algorithms, and of the ‘SEMANTIC WEB’!)”.
    .
    GOD IMPLORES OF US A LOVING COMMUNICATION!… AND A LOVING COMMUNICATION IS NON-RELATIVE, DEFINITIVE, CONSISTENT, NON-SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND INTEROPERABLE!… PERIOD!
    .
    And it’s my guess, that such is the standard for all TRULY ADVANCED exo-civilizations! Heck, even ants and the Corona virus know the importance of effective “speech”!
    .
    .
    T̲o̲ ̲B̲e̲, O̲r̲ ̲N̲o̲t̲ ̲T̲o̲ ̲B̲e̲, T̲h̲a̲t̲ ̲I̲s̲ ̲T̲h̲e̲ ̲T̲r̲a̲n̲s̲g̲e̲n̲d̲e̲r̲ ̲Q̲u̲e̲s̲t̲i̲o̲n̲
    .
    .
    The following (and despite the seeming “scary titles”!) is a step toward our understanding of the Transgendered, and those that/ which comprise the LGBQ+ Communities! And so and thus, and as the TRUTH will set us free… let the TRUTH be told!
    .
    (This Review article is by courtesy of Raven Clabough, of The New American, of Wednesday, August 24, 2016… and I have omitted altering its textual appearance [save, for my added Postscript, that/ which seeks to assert my position on the direction of Raven Clabough’s Review, and what I believe noteworthy re the highlighted remarks quoted within the Review prepared by Clabough, from/ on The Atlantis Journal Report on Transgenderism].)…
    .
    .
    LIFE… FOR EACH AND EVERY ONE OF US!… IS A STRUGGLE FOR INTRAPERSONAL INTRAHOMEOSTASIS AND INTERPERSONAL INTERHOMEOSTASIS, GOVERNED BY THE MECHANISM OF CONSCIENCE! IN BOTH CASES OF INTRAPERSONAL INTRAHOMEOSTASIS AND INTERPERSONAL INTERHOMEOSTASIS WE SUCCEED OR FAIL TO THE DEGREE OF OUR WILLINGNESS TO RESIST DEFEAT OF CONSCIENCE! CONSCIENCE ISN’T TO BE CONFUSED WITH MERE WILL… AS THE WILL HAS THE POWER TO LIE… BUT, IT’S THE JOB OF THE WILL TO PROTECT CONSCIENCE– I.E., YOU! IN OTHER WORDS, CONSCIENCE CAN ONLY CONTINUE TO REVEAL IT’S̲ CONCLUSIONS IF THE WILL ACTS TO DEFEND THESE IN THE FACE OF AN INTRAPERSONAL AND/ OR INTERPERSONAL CHALLENGE! – JOHN MAYOR
    .
    .
    Study Finds No Scientific Basis For Transgenderism
    .
    .
    The Left often likes to use science — or rather, a modified version of science — in arguments related to atheism, evolution, abortion, climate change, etc. But just how it will deal with a new scientific study on transgenderism remains to be seen. According to a new report published in The New Atlantis Journal, transgenderism — the latest hot button social justice “ism” — is not supported by science.
    .
    The report was co-authored by former Chief of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Hospital and Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University Dr. Paul McHugh and Arizona State University Professor of Statistics and Biostatistics Lawrence Mayer. They concluded that “gender identity” is not separate from biological sex.
    .
    “Examining research from the biological, psychological, and social sciences, this report shows that some of the most frequently heard claims about sexuality and gender are not supported by scientific evidence,” the report prefaced.
    .
    “The hypothesis that gender identity is an innate, fixed property of human beings that is independent of biological sex — that a person might be ‘a man trapped in a woman’s body’ or ‘a woman trapped in a man’s body’ — is not supported by scientific evidence,” stated the researchers.
    .
    This is not exactly groundbreaking news to those who exercise common sense, of course. Simply because an individual purports to identify as something doesn’t make it true, particularly if it is biologically impossible. It does not take a scientific study to confirm that a person who identifies as a horse, for example, is not a horse, or one who identifies as a chair is not in fact a chair. But the study should provide some weight to the common sense approach to transgenderism, while simultaneously exploding the beliefs of some social justice warriors who may have difficulty reconciling this scientific study with their own sense of reality.
    .
    The New Atlantis report is sure to provoke some controversy, as it challenges a number of theories that have been readily accepted by the general public in recent years, including what the authors dub the “born that way” hypothesis: “The notion that homosexuality or heterosexuality is in any given person unchangeable and determined entirely apart from choices, behaviors, life experiences, and social contexts.” According to the authors, that view is not “well-supported by research.”
    .
    The authors also take issue with the criteria found in the fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) for diagnosis of gender dysphoria in children, and the interventions used in the treatment of gender dysphoria despite the lack of scientific evidence behind them.
    .
    At particular issue for the researchers is how transgenderism is being foisted on America’s youth, as the scientists note that most children outgrow gender confusion, and efforts to advocate transgender acceptance are sure to create further confusion. “Children are a special case when addressing transgender issues. Only a minority of children who experience cross-gender identification will continue to do so into adolescence or adulthood,” the report stated.
    .
    “There is little scientific evidence for the therapeutic value of interventions that delay puberty or modify the secondary sex characteristics of adolescents, although some children may have improved psychological well-being if they are encouraged and supported in their cross-gender identification,” wrote the researchers. “There is no evidence that all children who express gender-atypical thoughts or behavior should be encouraged to become transgender.”
    .
    The report argued that enabling acceptance of transgenderism through medical intervention is particularly harmful. “An area of particular concern involves medical interventions for gender-nonconforming youth. They are increasingly receiving therapies that affirm their felt genders, and even hormone treatments or surgical modifications at young ages,” the authors observed.
    .
    These sentiments are similar to those found in a position statement released by the American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds) on March 21 entitled “Gender Ideology Harms Children,” in which the writers observed that any policies that foster the belief that gender dysphoria is anything beyond a psychological problem are in fact harmful.
    .
    The authors of that position statement made several scientific observations, including that human sexuality “is an objective biological binary trait.” Children who use hormones to attempt to mimic a sex that is not their own have a number of dangerous physical and mental risks, the position statement advised, adding that “conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful” can be classified as child abuse.
    .
    According to The New Atlantis study, in fact, conditioning anyone to accept impersonation of the opposite sex via surgery or chemical influences is harmful. The authors observe that adults who choose to have sex-reassignment surgeries have “a higher risk of experiencing poor mental health outcomes.” They cite a study that found that sex-“reassigned individuals were about 5 times more likely to attempt suicide and about 19 times more likely to die by suicide.”
    .
    Interestingly, PJ Media did a piece earlier this week on some of the real-life victims of what it dubbed the transgender “cult.” These” victims” were encouraged to embrace their gender confusion in their youth and are now living with the repercussions of those decisions. “I am a real, live 22-year-old woman, with a scarred chest and a broken voice, and five o’clock shadow because I couldn’t face the idea of growing up to be a woman. That’s my reality,” Cari Stella confessed in a YouTube video. “Gender was done to me, gender was traumatizing to me, I don’t want anything to do with it anymore,” she declared. She admitted, “When I was transitioning, I felt a strong desire — what I would have called a ‘need’ at the time — to transition.”
    .
    Stella now contends that her transition only made things worse. “It can be damn hard to figure out that the treatment you’re being told is to help you is actually making your mental health worse. Testosterone made me even more dissociated than I already was,” she said.
    .
    Stella is a prime example of an observation made by the authors in The New Atlantis study. They wrote, “The potential that patients undergoing medical and surgical sex reassignment may want to return to a gender identity consistent with their biological sex suggests that reassignment carries considerable psychological and physical risk.” The report ultimately concluded that politics and culture have been far too influential in the understanding of transgenderism and LGBT-related mental health problems, and encouraged individuals to take a more scientific approach to these issues.
    .
    The researchers wrote, “While there is much controversy surrounding how our society treats its LGBT members, no political or cultural views should discourage us from understanding the related clinical and public health issues and helping people suffering from mental health problems that may be connected to their sexuality.”
    .
    They readily admitted that better research is required to determine the best ways to help lower the rates of poor mental health outcomes in the LGBT community, but noted that despite the scientific uncertainty behind sexual orientation and gender identity, “drastic interventions” continue to be prescribed and delivered to patients.
    .
    In June, McHugh noted that despite the lack of biological or physical basis for sexual identity, scientists struggled to persuade others that transgenderism is a psychological disorder because “there is a deep prejudice in favor of the idea that nature is totally malleable.”
    .
    The authors of the article welcomed “spirited responses” to their report, and it is likely they will be barraged with exactly that.
    .
    .
    P.S.:…
    .
    “Only a minority of children who experience cross-gender identification will continue to do so into adolescence or adulthood….” – New Atlantis Journal Report on Transgenderism
    .
    “There is no evidence that all children who express gender-atypical thoughts or behavior should be encouraged to become transgender.” – New Atlantis Journal Report on Transgenderism
    .
    Simply put… given these two passages, alone, the New Atlantis Journal Report on Transgenderism HAS NOT “closed the door” to the reality, that some “gender subjects” are– in fact!– OUTSIDE OF THE NORM with respect to SEXUAL IDENTIFICATION/ ORIENTATION!… and so, the New Atlantis Journal Report is “less dogmatic” than the author of this REPORT REVIEW would have us believe– at least, by way of the Report Review’s title!– when it comes to the author’s critique of Transgenderism, and the “Born That Way” phenomenon! However!… it should be duly noted, that such “Transgender subjects” are RARE, and should not be arbitrarily associated with the “common sexual self-ascription” that/ which is linked to many of the members within/ of the LGBQ+ communities (so-called!)! In other words… despite the title of this REVIEW of the The New Atlantis Journal Report on Transgenderism by author Raven Clabough of The New American, and the suggested overall conclusions of the Report by Raven Clabough, the just noted quotes from the Report LEAVE THE DOOR OPEN– BY DEFAULT– TO THE EXISTENCE OF TRANSGENDERISM (however tiny this hybrid sexual population actually is!)! Nevertheless… the LGBQ+ community would have us believe that their members– for the most part– are “part and parcel” with this small percentage of our population, and that the “born that way” Transgender phenomenon is SYNONYMO̲S̲ with the vast majority of the LGBQ+ community! And on that observation, I’d have you note my personal findings, as follows:…
    .
    .
    T̲h̲e̲ ̲P̲S̲E̲U̲D̲O̲M̲E̲T̲A̲P̲H̲Ý̲L̲O̲U̲ ̲G̲a̲y̲, ̲L̲e̲s̲b̲i̲a̲n̲, ̲B̲i̲s̲e̲x̲u̲a̲l̲, ̲Q̲u̲e̲e̲r̲ ̲A̲n̲d̲ ̲P̲l̲u̲s̲ ̲A̲g̲e̲n̲d̲a̲s̲ ̲A̲n̲d̲ ̲M̲e̲m̲e̲s̲ ̲O̲f̲t̲e̲n̲ ̲P̲o̲s̲e̲ ̲A̲s̲ ̲A̲ ̲P̲H̲Y̲S̲I̲Ó̲M̲E̲T̲A̲P̲H̲Ý̲L̲O̲U̲ ̲A̲g̲e̲n̲d̲a̲ ̲A̲n̲d̲ ̲M̲e̲m̲e̲
    .
    .
    PSEUDOMETAPHÝLOU: one who feigns being PHYSIÓMETAPHÝLOU, but, who’s– actually– not naturally/ geneti̲c̲l̲y̲ oriented toward a “born that way” TRANSGENDER ORIENTATION… and who has CHOSEN a PSYCHOSEXUAL ORIENTATION, rather than having been geneti̲c̲l̲y̲ sexually oriented… and who is, usually, a “DISGUISED MEMBER” of an LGBQ+ Community.
    .
    PHYSIÓMETAPHÝLOU: one who is naturally/ geneti̲c̲l̲y̲ oriented toward a “born that way” TRANSGENDER ORIENTATION… and, whose PSYCHOSEXUAL ORIENTATION has come about as a consequence of interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents that/ which acknowledge the need for the knowledge of, and the means for HUGIÉSIC SEXUAL AGENCY.
    .
    PHYSIÓPHÝLOU (a replacement of the expression, “cisgender”): one who is naturally/ geneti̲c̲l̲y̲ oriented toward a non-transgendered orientation… and whose PSYCHOSEXUAL ORIENTATION has developed as a result of interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents that/ which acknowledge the need for the knowledge of, and the means for HUGIÉSIC SEXUAL AGENCY.
    .
    TECHNOMETAPHÝLOU: one whose PHYSIÓMETAPHÝLOU ORIENTATION or PHYSIÓPHÝLOU ORIENTATION has been altered by way of TECHNI̲C̲ MEANS (and e.g., chemi̲c̲l̲y̲, and/ or mechani̲c̲l̲y̲) to “remedy” a PHYSIÓMETAPHÝLOU or PHYSIÓPHÝLOU STATE that/ which one is SCIENTIFICALLY and CONSCIENABLY convinced is in need of “REMEDIAL ALTERATION”… or, one whose PHYSIÓMETAPHÝLOU ORIENTATION or PHYSIÓPHÝLOU ORIENTATION has been altered by way of TECHNI̲C̲ MEANS, but, whose PSYCHOSEXUAL ORIENTATION has been adversely sidelined by intrapersonal and interpersonal antecedents that/ which deny/ interfere with the need for the knowledge of, and the means for HUGIÉSIC SEXUAL AGENCY (i.e., a personal SCIENTIFIC and CONSCIENABLE conviction of one’s decision to effect a “TECHNI̲C̲ ALTERED TRANSITION”!).
    .
    METAASYMPHONY: a declared or an undeclared Trans individual who holds two or more contradictory PSYCHOSEXUAL ideas, values or beliefs pertaining to one’s PSYCHOSEXUAL ORIENTATION, and participates in an action that goes against one of these, and subsequently experiences “psychologi̲c̲ stress (e.g., guilt, paranoia, and etc.)” because of the action. According to Cognitive Dissonance Theory (in Psychology), when two ideas or actions are not psychologi̲c̲l̲y̲ consistent with each other, an individual may do all in one’s power to change these inconsistent ideas or actions until they become consistent (and, e.g., by giving up one of the incompatible ideas or actions, or suppressing the “intrapersonal dissonant discomfort”, and/ or, attempting to suppress any “interpersonal dissonant discomfort” presented by way of any “social signals [from one or more persons]” that/ which may directly and/ or indirectly precipitate the “intrapersonal dissonant discomfort” of a soul who’s adopted an idea or action contrary to inherently consistent ideas, values or beliefs; and so, “transfers” the “accountability” for the mitigation or end of “intrapersonal dissonant discomfort” onto accepting or unwitting interpersonal targets through supplications to interpersonal targets, or through the “PSYCHOSEXUAL GASLIGHTING” of interpersonal targets).
    .
    In “A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957)”, Leon Festinger proposed that human beings strive for “internal psychologi̲c̲ consistency” to function mentally in the real world. A person who experiences “internal inconsistency” tends to become psychologi̲c̲l̲y̲ uncomfortable and is motivated to reduce the cognitive dissonance. One tends to make changes to justify the stressful ideas or actions, either by adding new parts to the cognition causing the “psychologi̲c̲ dissonance”, or by avoiding circumstances and info contradictory to one’s adopted intrapersonal balance and comfort zone, and which are perceived likely to enlarge the magnitude of one’s cognitive dissonance.
    .
    Coping with the nuances of contradictory ideas or actions is mentally stressful. It requires mental energy and effort to entertain opposite things that all seem true. Festinger argued that some people would inevitably resolve dissonance by BLINDLY BELIEVING WHATEVER THEY WANTED TO FOLLOW, and sometimes, SACRIFICING GOOD CONSCIENCE.
    .
    METAMISOGYNY: the PSEUDOMETAPHÝLOU, PHYSIÓMETAPHÝLOU or TECHNOMETAPHÝLOU hatred of, contempt for, or prejudice against non-transgender females. Metamisogyny manifests as/ in: patriarchy, protransobjectification/ transcentrism, trans privilege, disenfranchisement, social exclusion, discrimination, belittling, hostility and violence.
    .
    METACHAUVINY: a form of extreme “trans-patriotism” and “trans-nationalism”, and a belief in “trans-national superiority” and “trans-glory”. It can also be defined as, “an irrational belief in the superiority or dominance of one’s own ‘trans-group’ or ‘trans-people'”. Moreover, the Metachauvinist’s own people are seen as unique, and special, while the rest of the “nontrans public” are considered weak or inferior; and so, will undertake campaigns of overt and covert “PSYCHODEMOEROTOS ENGINEERING”.
    .
    .
    T̲o̲r̲n̲ ̲T̲h̲a̲t̲ ̲W̲a̲y̲, ̲P̲o̲r̲n̲ ̲T̲h̲a̲t̲ ̲W̲a̲y̲ ̲O̲r̲ ̲B̲o̲r̲n̲ ̲T̲h̲a̲t̲ ̲W̲a̲y̲
    .
    .
    The PSEUDOMETAPHÝLOU Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Queer Agenda and meme (LGBQ Agenda and meme), frequently poses as the PHYSIÓMETAPHÝLOU/ Natural Transgender Agenda and meme (the PSEUDOMETAPHÝLOU LGBQ Agenda and meme and the Natural Transgender Agenda and meme, not to be confused with the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Queer and Transsexual Agenda and meme, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Queer Transsexual PSEUDOMETAPHÝLOU Reassignment Agenda and meme and, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Queer Transvestite Agenda and meme… which are other issues altogether!)!
    .
    All Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals and Queers were not simply “born that way”… and, just as all TRANsexuals/ transsexuals and Transvestites were not “born that way”.
    .
    Such thinking would suggest that there’s no such thing as VOLITION when it comes to one’s sexual orientation (the TRULY TRANSGENDERED, the only exception). And again, not to be confused with those who are PSEUDOMETAPHÝLOU Transsexuals… and Transsexuals who have CHOSEN PSEUDOMETAPHÝLOU Reassignment (and CHOSEN, DESPITE EVIDENCE of any proven biologi̲c̲/ genetic predisposition to being “born that way”… and evidence, revealing a TRULY PHYSIÓMETAPHÝLOU/ Naturally Transgendered Orientation”).
    .
    The rationale for PHYSIÓMETAPHÝLOU Reassignment Surgery IS NOT SYNONYMO̲S̲… AND IS NoT TO BE MADE SO!…by way of a CAPRICIOUS DECISION by a lesbian, gay, bisexual or queer soul to simply demand (and to conscript others into capitulating to such!) a MEDI̲C̲L̲Y̲ UNNECESSARY PSEUDOMETAPHÝLOU Reassignment Surgi̲c̲ Procedure!
    .
    For, it’s one thing for a six year old boy to want to cut off his genitals due to an overwhelming biologi̲c̲ tendency (i.e., hormonal) to femininity!… but, it’s quite another matter to do so, based upon a series of “peer-based, familially-based and/ or socially-based (stranger-based) behavioural influences (and e.g.,… and in many instances!… due to incidents of ‘peer-based, incest-based and/ or socially-based [stranger-based] SEXUAL ABUSE’!)”!
    .
    And so… the question, is:… “Is one ‘coming out’ to ‘publicize’ one’s LGBQ-based ‘CHOICE’ of orientation (a CHOICE, based on whatever ‘nurture-based/ non-biologi̲c̲’ circumstances may have led one to one’s decision!)?… or, is one ‘coming out’ to end the REAL mental/ emotional anguish of a TRULY LEGIT ‘biologi̲c̲l̲y̲-based condition’ that one has had, and has no control over (and which may have led one– and may be leading one– to the point of self-harm… or– worse!– to an eventual suicide!)?”
    .
    If it’s the former… OK!… that is one’s CHOICE!… but, don’t then (and if it was one’s CHOICE!), have one’s self believe– and/ or have “us” believe!– that one’s decision to “come forward” was based upon some biologi̲c̲/ genetic precondition that preempted one’s true decisionmaking (i.e., that one was “born that way”!… or that one had no FREE CHOICE in the matter!)! And, if one’s otherwise FREE CHOICE was preempted by way of someone else’s manipulation of one’s FREE WILL (e.g., by way of an ABUSER!)!… and, one has suffered– and/ or is suffering!– mental/ emotional anguish as a result of someone else’s past, and/ or present sexual gaslighting of one’s otherwise FREE WILL!… THAT MANIPULATION doesn’t equate to being “born that way”! And to have been abused, and to then capitulate to the abuse and one’s abuser after the fact, is to abandon respect for one’s self, and to grant freedom to an abuser to abuse others! And so!… and if the just aforesaid be the case!… one must begin to sort out– honestly!– what has happened (and/ or is still happening!) to one’s person, and to seek to either accept a TRULY “TRANSGENDERED STATE”, or to establish whether one’s otherwise “FREE WILL” in deciding one’s “sexual orientation” has been preempted (and/ or is still being preempted!) by another, or not!
    .
    .
    H̲o̲l̲l̲y̲w̲o̲o̲d̲’̲s̲ ̲O̲b̲s̲e̲s̲s̲i̲o̲n̲
    .
    .
    In theme, it is my intuited hunch that Demi Devonne Lovato’s bipolarism and past drug use have their roots in DDL’s past confusion concerning DDL’s sexual allowances, which have made it difficult for DDL to remain true to a familially acquired sexual ethos! Desiring to be both sympathetic/ empathatic to the cause of Transgenderism, DDL has fallen victim to some within the entertainment community who are “LESS THAN HONEST” about their respective sexualities (e.g., about the CHOSEN NATURE for much of their respective “born that way” sexualities!), and who’s been lured– against theis’ upbringing!– into a deceptive acceptance of a PSEUDOMETAPHÝLOU STATE… but, one, which is predicated upon emotional manipulation and outright abuse! Having crossed the line into this fabricated and abusive dichotomy… and wanting to befriend those whom DDL has been conned into believing are truly Transgendered (and “born that way” subjects)!… DDL has found it difficult to rationalize theone’s own sexual identity, and has permitted a “familial schism” between theoneself and DDL’s more Conservative upbringing! Nonetheless, given the loving supports from theone’s family and TRUE friends, I am hopeful that DDL’s “Walk on the PSEUDOMETAPHÝLOU Side” is but a passing phase, and will lead to a more mature reflection on what Transgenderism is REALLY all about, where DDL’s sexuality begins and where the PSEUDOMETAPHÝLOU end! Simply, DDL’s problem has been the inability to see the Transgendered Forest for the “PSEUDOMETAPHÝLOU Trees”!
    .
    Nevertheless, DDL’s recent public self-identification as nonbinary should be taken at face-value, and theone’s gender journey as legit!… but, how this decision will mesh with Transgender facts, with theis’ once averred faith, theone’s conservative family and professed binary friendships, is unclear!
    .
    In contrast, Rosie O’Donnell… and but one example of the ensuing… is so steeped in “sexual self-deception”, PSEUDOMETAPHÝLOUISMÓS (Pseudotransgenderism… for the Greek suffix, ISMÓS, see bit*ly/2Uhpzzz) and Erotoanastrophéopathy (Sexual Behavioural Pathy), that TRUE TRANSGENDERISM has become but an excuse for confrontation and “politi̲c̲-sociosexual manipulation”! In other words, there’s NO ROOM to h̲o̲n̲e̲s̲t̲l̲y̲ address the “Nashville Statement’s” factual error surrounding Transgenderism, as “ROD” has already rendered the subject meaningless… and by theone’s dismissive conclusion, that all who are BORN THAT WAY are merely anyone who cares to be so labeled!… and, rather, than allow the scientific data to be made manifest (and, preferably, by way of documented individual cases/ case studies [the New Atlantis Journal Report on Transgenderism, being but one example]!)!
    .
    CONSCIONABLE and RESPONSIBLE observers of the evolving LGBTQ+ dialogue should advocate that the “T” within LGBTQ+ should be removed from the acronym and given its own Agenda… as the PHYSIÓMETAPHÝLOU aren’t to be made synonymo̲s̲ with most of the self-ascribed souls within the “LGBQ+” Communities! This then recognizes the scientific evidence supporting a PHYSIÓMETAPHÝLOU COMMUNITY (however small)… but, stops short of accepting this title for the vast majority of the members comprising the LGBQ+ Communities!… the latter of which, are “ORIENTATIONS BY/ OF CHOICE (unless, proven/ demonstrated otherwise!)”! And, of the populations of the LGBQ+ who are shown to be by/ of “CHOICE”, their “Pride” is in their “CHOSEN ORIENTATIONS”!… and rather, than in their respective “BORN-THAT-WAY BIOLOGI̲C̲ FATEFULNESS”!
    .
    As for those within our student population (in particular!) who simply hate anyone who is Transgendered or who is a member of the LGBQ+ Commmunities, our Faculties of Education (responsible for teaching teachers how to teach) have no mandate to incorporate “Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Intelligence (the ‘Three I_s’)”… yea, the Behavioural Sciences… within the skill sets of our Pedagogies and within the lives of our students. That job– we’re led to adopt– is the job of parents, guardians and would-be and wannabe “behavioural mentors”. It is time to place Education withunder the correct model… i.e., withunder the Health Model!… and to impart within our Pedagogies the skill sets teachers require to measure Anastrophéopathy (Behavioural Pathy) and to instruct in Anastrophéohugey (Behavioural Health)! Otherwise, we are doomed to repeat our behavioural errors; and, thereby, commit our youth to more generations of “behavioural misadventure”! (See the work, The Death Of Psychiatry, by Dr. E.F. Torrey.)
    .
    See also, sciencenews*org/article/no-evidence-that-gay-gene-exists
    .
    .
    W̲h̲o̲’̲s̲ ̲Z̲o̲o̲m̲i̲n̲ ̲W̲h̲o̲?̲
    .
    .
    OUR RESPECTIVE INDIVIDUAL AND DEMOSIC COGNITIVE DIDACTIC AND MÁTHĒTICᵃ INABILITY TO ACQUIRE, IDENTIFY, INTERPRET, RETAIN AND SHARE HUGIÉSICᵇ INFORMATION AND TO ESCHEW PATHOSIC INFORMATION, IS MANIFEST EVIDENCE OF INDIVIDUAL AND DEMOSIC COGNITIVE DIDACTOPATHIC DISSONANCE AND INDIVIDUAL AND DEMOSIC COGNITIVE MÁTHĒTOPATHIC DISSONANCE; AND SO AND THUSLY, COMPELLING THE PLACING OF OUR RESPECTIVE INDIVIDUAL AND DEMOSIC DIDACTIC AND MÁTHĒTIC THEORIES AND PRACTICES WITHUNDER HEALTH’S MODEL! – JOHN MAYOR
    .
    .
    It would appear that pedagogies either “can’t” accept that a family’s home environment plays a role in affecting children’s learning/ in education, or these simply do not care… and such might not care, because to do so, would be to necessitate bringing the whole of education under the Developmental Model-Medi̲c̲ Model– in contrast to a detached “vocational ed model”– and to admit that their entire approach to teaching and learning has missed the “Psycho-developmental/ Psycho-medi̲c̲ elephant” in the proverbial room: that “vocational teaching and learning”– of any sort!– MUST TAKE A BACK SEAT TO DEVELOPMENTAL-MEDI̲C̲ TEACHING AND LEARNING.
    .
    For “winged educationalists (left or right)” “education” is about– “passively aggressively”!– “pushing” the “vocational curriculum agenda” within the “classroom”… after all, what’s a WINGY CLASSROOM for if not to prepare a student toward some “NON-DEVELOPMENTAL/ NON-MEDI̲C̲ FOR-PROFIT OCCUPATION”– in contrast, to a “NON-BRANDED/ NON-WINGY/ GENERIC STUDENT’S” PSYCHO-DEVELOPMENTAL/ PSYCHO-THERAPEUTIC NEEDS.
    .
    By virtue of the existence of a “classroom”, pedagogies are forever bound to a “one-size-fits-all” homo-didactic approach!… and so, how do Faculties of Ed provide a “no-shoe-fits-all” mentality, within a “one-size-fits-all” academic environment?
    .
    The problem here, reader… “Information Engineering problem”!… is how to implement a preferred individualized approach to teaching and learning within an education system that is geared to “mass teaching” and “mass learning” at the “get-go”! Does one place an AI and machine learning based “teaching and learning pixie bot” on the desk of every student?… which are versed in the personal learning curve of a given student, and able to send verbal guidance to a student’s audio headset! Or, maybe our “teaching and learning pixie bots” should replace the teacher altogether!… whose new role, would be to constantly monitor a student’s interaction with one’s own personally assigned “teaching and learning pixie bot” from a secluded and remote location, and tweak the “pixie bot’s” approach according to parameters established by the “pixie bot’s” interaction with the student! Holy Botman!
    .
    What about the establishment of global dedicated subject-centric webizen mentoring programs that/ which link learners to more experienced subject-capable students and teachers anywhere in the world!… which could improve our individual and collective learning curves on all fronts! But then, what about Development?
    .
    And, should teachers (and all AI and Machine Learning based subsets) be C̲E̲R̲T̲I̲F̲I̲E̲D̲ in Applied and Theoretic Teaching and Applied and Theoretic Learning (and REGARDLESS of any particular curriculum to be taught and REGARDLESS of any particular curriculum to be learned) before these enter a classroom (physi̲c̲ or virtual)?… let alone, CERTIFIED IN PSYCHO-DEVELOPMENTAL AND PSYCHO-THERAPEUTIC TEACHING AND LEARNING! Do we need to “reinvent” the Faculty of Ed… to now accommodate AI, Machine Learning, Botic Science, Developmental Behavioural Science and Psychoneurotherapeutic Science, that/ which will augment yesterday’s boring curriculum-centric focus– BUT, ETC.?
    .
    It is assumed and presumed by many that the “stuff” of sound subconscious/ subsentient mental behaviour and sound thelemic/ wilful mental behaviour can only be shaped by parents, guardians, extended family members, religious leaders, would-be mentors, the noble war veteran down the street and virtual leaders to be found online and/ or within print or ebooks… and, that the classroom is but a, “for-profit-only/ non-archéxistential vocational conduit”!
    .
    But, as we have come to learn… and far too often!… the lacks in both INTRApersonal and INTERpersonal development (biologi̲c̲l̲y̲ based, and/ or informationally based/ nurture based!) can be L̲E̲T̲H̲A̲L̲!
    .
    People, I ask you: What’s more important in the way of information acquisition and dissemination… consumer product and/ or service info for “gainful employment” and industry, or LIFE SKILLS (the latter, which can help us to rationalize the very need for the former… and except for very carefully circumscribed/ prescribed gainful skills, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND!)?
    .
    To sum up, if the Behavioural Sciences be T̲R̲U̲E̲ sciences… and we can retrofit our Faculties of Education (and again, are responsible for teaching our teachers how to teach) to include the DIAGNOSIS/ ASSESSMENT and TREATMENT of dysic behaviour and the INSTRUCTION and MANAGEMENT in anosic behaviour (i.e., “disease-free behaviour”… see, a-nosos/ anosia), then I suggest bringing the whole of our Educational Institutions withunder the Health Model, IS LONG PAST-DUE!
    .
    For, what be the WHOLE of the acquisition and dissemination of information and data (yea, of Information Science, proper!) if not but a series of TRUTHS or– sadly!– OTHER THAN TRUTHS?… and so, transforming the gathering and dissemination of TRUTHFUL INFO and the NEGATION OF UNTRUTHFUL INFO (and, respective of, and regardless of the variety of info and data associated with EVERY TECHNE being pursued by anthropogénos [a replacement for the term, “mankind”… to, “humankind”!]… IN ADDITION TO THE BEHAVIOUR THAT WILL WIELD EVERY TECHNE PURSUED BY ANTHROPOGÉNOS!) THE BIGGEST HEALTHCARE CRISIS– AND PRIORITY!– FACING ANTHROPOGÉNOS! AND, BAR NONE!
    .
    And because, the thing on the top of our shoulders… and the stuff that’s passing through it (or is failing to pass through it!) IS IMPACTING ON US ALL/ ON ALL ELSE!
    .
    And, if at the end of the proverbial day our revamped Teaching Profession/ would-be Behavioural Health Profession is still unable to “pull the trigger” on Behavioural DISease Assessment and Treatment and Behavioural Health Instruction and Management… and because, we’re inherently incapable of bootstrapping our dysic condition!… then we may need to look beyond ourselves to heal our behaviours! But, the question, is: Will we receive the answers to our behavioural condition… even if provided?
    .
    .
    All the Best!… and may God find you Blessworthy!
    .
    .
    P.S.:…
    .
    ᵃFor máthētic, see:
    ———————
    merriam-webster*com/dictionary/mathetic
    en*wiktionary*org/wiki/μάθησις
    en*wiktionary*org/wiki/mathesis
    en*wiktionary*org/wiki/learning
    translate*google*com/ (Greek to English translation of: ἐπῐ́μάθησης, ἐπῐ́μάθηση, εκμάθησης, εκμάθηση, μάθησης and μάθηση)
    .
    ᵇFor HUGIÉS, see:
    —————–
    biblehub*com/greek/5199*htm (for sound/ whole/ healthy… and biblehub*com/greek/3554*htm and ά-νόσος/ a-nososic/ a-nosic/ A-NOSY, for without nosos/ without disease)
    .
    For epididactic and epimáthētic (as in epigenetics), see:
    ———————————————————
    en.wiktionary*org/wiki/ἐπί (ἐπί/ epi… under Preposition [2. {+ dative}], see, 13. and 14., for “after” and “cause”, respectively)
    .
    Note: although the ensuing be neologisms, such are accurate Greek-Latin-English (Greeklish) transliterations based upon Classi̲c̲ Greek linguistic morphemic elements… and is, collectively– I suggest!– a helpful addition to a future Health Pedagogic Nomenclature for a “revitalized” “Teaching Profession (i.e., one trained in Mental DISease Assessment [physi̲c̲l̲y̲-based and/ or informationally-based] and, in Mental Health Instruction and Management… and, any Physi̲c̲ Assessment, the role of licensed practitioners authorized to sign-off on a substantive Physi̲c̲ Impairment Diagnosis, and any Physi̲c̲ Treatment, the role of licensed practitioners authorized to sign-off on a demonstrated suspected physi̲c̲ treatment regimen;… and, in IDIOHYGIESEMIOPOIÉSIS THEORY [Personal Health Meaning Making Theory… i.e., an ‘IDIOHYGIEBIOSEMIOTIC THEORY’ on the biomechanisms underpinning a lack and/ or an ability in an individual to assess, understand and assign INTRApersonal and INTERpersonal healthy signals/ healthy meanings [see, Biosemiotics/ Biosemiosis, and the hoped-for fields of PSYCHONEUROSEMIOPOIÉOPATHOLOGY and PSYCHONEUROSEMIOPOIÉOANOSOLOGY])”.
    .
    Under ANTHROPANASTROPHÉOLOGY (the study of human behaviour… it’s̲ state, condition or process/ ANTHROPANASTROPHÉOSIS) we have the ensuing 2 main sub-category groups: ANASTROPHÉOPATHOLOGY (the study of ANASTROPHÉOPATHY and it’s̲ ANASTROPHÉOPATHOSIS), and ANASTROPHÉOPATHIATRY (the treatment of ANASTROPHÉOPATHY’S ANASTROPHÉOPATHOSIS); ANASTROPHÉOANOSOLOGY (the study of ANASTROPHÉOANOSY and it’s̲ ANASTROPHÉOANOSOSIS), and ANASTROPHÉOANOSONOMY (the management of ANASTROPHÉOANOSIC ANASTROPHÉOANOSOSIS).
    .
    (For ἈΝΑΣΤΡΟΦΉ/ ANASTROPHÉ, for behaviour, see, bit*ly/3pwTvGW; for Ἀ-/ A-, for without, see, bit*ly/3EpkSZE; and for ΝΌΣΟΣ/ NOSOS, for disease, see, bit*ly/3EqoiLx.)
    .
    (Although the Greek use, ὙΓΙΉΣ/ hugiés/ ugiés/ ugié, for sound/ whole/ healthy is a legitimate and entrenched expression, a-nosia/ a-nosos/ a-noso are more explicit.)

  7. Avatar

    JOHN MAYOR

    July 14, 2022 at 12:26 pm

    bit*ly/3PaLWRN

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Trending on Valiant News:

Liberal Hypocrisy

"He's not too sure," Biden said of the little boy, who then quickly scurried away from the president. 

Politics

McConnell vowed never to speak to Donald Trump again on the night of January 6, but later feared political reprisal should he impeach

World News

International media is none too pleased with Giorgia Meloni's victory, and have called the Italian populist everything from Literally Mussolini to a Threat to...

Social Media

Nick Clegg, president for global affairs at Meta, said that they will consult with "experts" to assess the chance of harm being caused by...